WHAT TO DO?

 There are existential questions that are repeated often and in all situations: that of what to do?  is an issue that involves several options of choice and action; the choice is embarrassing because we want that choice to be the optimum; not regret it later as often happens. How to make the most efficient our initiative? To do this, one must have a basic knowledge of self and objectively as possible: see, for example, if one is optimistic or pessimistic; if one is optimistic, it is in favor of the pre-established harmony dear to Leibniz who sees that all is for the best in the best of all possible worlds and therefore every action, every choice that can not be positive, and despite the reality that shows the contrary; it remains inherent temperament optimiste.But everything if one is pessimistic; we believe that the world is bad, men are worse: all the tests to change the course of things is a failure;  is the fatality, so we book blind doom that leads us inexorably to our bad fate. Wars; diseases; death, are the lot of men and ask what to do does not make sense; since the short of things is binding, the human will is powerless.  For my part I advocated a pragmatic answer to the question: what to do,  is to say that an answer must take into considerations the basic parameters of any action are threefold. to follow ...